Source: Feet in 2 Worlds
![]() |
| Camilo Godoy's photo series depicting an image of his boyfriend juxtaposed with an image taken in the same location after his boyfriend was deported |
By Von Diaz & bull
I don’t often get the opportunity to share my reporting experiences in academic settings. Quite the opposite, actually. I’ve often heard academic scholars discount the work of journalists as theoretically unsound, or overly simplistic.
Last weekend, the Union of Political Science Students (UPSS) of the New School for Social Research hosted its annual graduate student conference, themed “Amplification and Resistance: Introducing Politics of the Globe.” I was invited to speak on the “Queer Migrations” panel, based on my reporting for Feet in Two Worlds.
My article was about Monica Alcota and Cristina Ojeda, a lesbian couple that may one day have to leave the U.S. because of immigration difficulties. Monica is an Argentinian immigrant who came to the U.S. to escape homophobia in her home country. Her visa expired years ago and in July 2009 she was arrested by the U.S. Border Patrol when they randomly searched a Greyhound bus on which she was a passenger. She was subsequently detained for 3 months. The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) prohibits Monica from applying for citizenship in the U.S. through her legal marriage to Cristina because they are a same-sex couple. If they were a heterosexual couple, Cristina could apply for citizenship for Monica, and her expired visa status could be pardoned.
People come to the U.S. for countless different reasons, but only heterosexuals have the option to remain in the country through marriage to a U.S. citizen. This has created a rather large population — as many as 35,000 according to one report from UCLA — of same-sex couples with immigrant partners who do not have equal access to citizenship through marriage.
I used Monica and Cristina’s case to tell a larger story about DOMA’s history, and how President Obama’s recent decision to challenge it’s constitutionality might have an immediate impact on LGBTQ immigrants who are legally married to — or plan to marry — U.S. citizens.











































