Photo by runran |
A law which could lead to the indefinite detention of asylum seekers has been passed by the Israeli parliament.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu voted for the bill, which his spokesman called part of a “multitiered strategy to deal with the challenge of illegal immigration to Israel.”
The bill has been sharply criticized by refugee advocates, and is seen as targeting some 50,000 Africans who have entered Israel illegally since 2005, according to Israeli government estimates.
And in a country built by refugees it has caused soul-searching with the conservative Jerusalem Post in a November 11 Editorial saying:
The law is the first one dealing with refugees - until now they have been managed under an emergency law from 1954.
The amended law will enable the Israeli authorities to hold in administrative detention for up to three years migrant workers and asylum seekers with their children. This is not unusual, although harsh. Australia, for example, also holds asylum seekers in detention for long periods although it is retreating from that policy because of the growing evidence that it produces serious mental harm. Contrary to that trend, the Israeli law's proponents argued that long detention periods would deter refugees.
Anyone who is fleeing from a so-called “enemy” country can be held indefinitely. This can mean those refugees and their children fleeing genocide from the Darfur region of Sudan or gays fleeing Iraq. The law stipulates that persons originating from such countries or areas are not to be bailed from detention under any conditions.
Any refugee or migrant committing the most minor infraction of Israeli law could be jailed from three years to life.
"This is extremely irregular, because in Israel today it is legally impossible to keep a person in custody for years without putting him on trial and proving his guilt in a legal procedure," Knesset legal advisor Eyal Yinon told the Constitution Committee last month.
The law will criminalize what it calls ‘irregular entry’ and makes no provision for those fleeing persecution.
It creates a summary removal procedure — within 72 hours — without giving the individual an adequate opportunity to challenge their deportation. There is no distinction made for how children will be treated.
The Justice Ministry had proposed that those aiding refugees could be criminally prosecuted - providing them with shelter could mean a prison sentence of between five and 15 years. That provision was amended at the last moment, so it no longer applies to organizations or people who provide humanitarian aid.
The Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI) has called the law:
Israeli activist Elizabeth Tsurkov wrote that:
The Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, a critical contributor to training and monitoring the Israeli immigration system, recently withdrew its presence in Israel in protest of Israeli treatment of asylum seekers. The US Department of State has echoed criticism of Israeli treatment of asylum seekers, condemning a lack of legal representation, lack of interpretation, in judicial hearings and extended detention.
The Africans reaching Israel face appalling conditions on the way with NGO EveryOne Group reporting only yesterday about 44 more Eritreans kidnapped for ransom in the Northern Sinai, including six children. They also reported that another African released by traffickers had then been tortured and shot in the leg by Egyptian police.
There have also been multiple, grisly reports of migrants in Egypt being targeted for body parts.
Really this is best blog so i got good law firm by this posting ....there have number of information of law.
ReplyDeleteThanks
And
Regards
Green card
Every contain is a right way, There are number of information have given by this blog post .
ReplyDeleteIn cases I think have no any info on blog .so I got Good lawyer and good informaiton about lawyer And Law so that according to me this is good blog...
Thanks
and
Regards
Defense Lawyer Comal