Monday, 22 November 2010

Mapping migration contributions by rich countries to poor ones

Source: Centre for global development

Which rich countries are doing the most to help poor ones? Rich and poor nations are linked in many ways—by foreign aid, commerce, the environment, and more. Each year, the CDI rates rich-country governments on how much they are helping poor countries via seven key linkages: aid, trade, investment, migration, environment, security, and technology. The CDI then takes the average for an overall score.

To see if countries live up to their potential to help, scoring adjusts for size. So small countries can beat big ones. Scores are on a standard scale and 5 = average.
The migration component of the CDI compares rich countries on how easy they make it for people from poor ones to immigrate, find work or get education, send home money--and even return home with new skills and capital.

Some 200 million people today—one in 33—do not live in the country where they were born. That number should grow as aging rich societies run short of workers, which should be a boon for development. Workers who have migrated from poor to rich countries already send billions of dollars back to their families each year, a flow that surpasses foreign aid. Some immigrants from developing countries, especially students, pick up skills and bring them home—engineers and physicians as well as entrepreneurs who, for example, start computer businesses.

But what about brain drain? Emigration has been blamed for emptying African clinics of nurses, who can earn far more in London hospitals. But CGD research fellow Michael Clemens has found little evidence that these skilled people hurt their home country by leaving it. Far more ails African clinics and hospitals than a lack of personnel, and personnel shortages themselves result from many forces—such as low pay and poor working conditions—untouched by international migration policies

The CDI rewards immigration of both skilled and unskilled people, though unskilled more so. One indicator used is the gross inflow of migrants from developing countries in a recent year, including unskilled and skilled immigrants but leaving out illegals. Another is the net increase in the number of unskilled immigrant residents from developing countries during the 1990s. (Based on census data, it cannot be updated often.) The Index also uses indicators of openness to students from poor countries and aid for refugees and asylum seekers.

Austria takes first for accepting the most migrants for its size, many from the civil war in Yugoslavia, with Sweden and Norway in second and third place. Near the bottom is Japan, which accepts 250,000 migrants a year from developing countries, a number equal to 0.2 percent of its own population.
Enhanced by Zemanta


  1. The brain drain attributed to migration is in many cases a result of persecution. Ensuring the free flow of ideas is an important part of the migration and asylum story:

  2. nice blog.. have a view of my blog when free.. .. do leave me some comment / guide if can.. if interested can follow my blog...

  3. @The First Blog

    Good point, but not being listened to much by UK government as they talk 'numbers' :[

    That post was great on asylumist btw, good point on LGBT asylum and one which I know is being explored.


Related Posts with Thumbnails