Showing posts with label belgium. Show all posts
Showing posts with label belgium. Show all posts

Thursday, 27 October 2011

Sri Lankan gay man granted asylum in the Belgium

leavingImage by lanchongzi via Flickr
Source: Gay Srilanka

We are pleased to announce another success in our Asylum cases. Gamini’s (not his real name) excited Skype message reached us on 4th October 2011 and read:
“I am very happy to inform you, that I was granted my gay asylum in Belgium. As I know I am the first [Sri Lankan] person who was granted an asylum based on my sexual orientation in Belgaum. As GaySriLankan and you personally helped me a lot on this matter. I am thanking you very much, because you helped me in every way not only giving supportive documents, but also personally taking your own time and advising me on skype about my problems which happen to me because of my gay life in Sri Lanka…”

We are happy for Gamini and wish him all the luck for his new life in the Belgium.

He personally contacted us and asked for help for his gay asylum in Belgium. When we go through his life story we came to know that he was going through lot of trauma and depression.

We did counsel with him a lot to come out of his current situation because he was a closeted gay person when he was living in Sri Lanka. Sri Lankan community around him had discriminated, harassed and threatened him because of his sexual orientation. One police officer had done death threats to him too.

When he was 10 years old he was raped by a man and the entire villagers pointed finger at him that he was responsible for being raped because of his feminine appearances. When he was going to a reputed College in Kandy, he was discriminated and exterminated from the leadership of his College debate team because of his girly voice. At that time he was the leader and their debate team was about to participate in all island level finals which was scheduled to be telecasted on national television.

He was kick out of his two jobs because of his feminine appearances and discriminated when some of his co-workers found out that he was a gay person. When he was in a relationship, his partner’s friend; a police officer found out about them.

Police officer had threatened him to death and told about his sexual orientation to his family and made them kick him out of his own home. When he was working overseas, these people made telephone threats at his work place and made his job discontinued.

Most of the gay people living in Sri Lanka, when found out that they are gay, are going through situations like this because of the discrimination and persecution from their own community. They are helpless and most of them have to fight for their lives or have to live in fear.

We sincerely hope that there will come a time when wonderful people such as Gamini don’t have to flee Sri Lanka because of the way they are treated there for being (gay) who they actually are. We hope in time, the laws will change in Sri Lanka and people are more accepting.

In the meanwhile, we will do our utmost to assist those who need our help.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, 25 October 2011

Video: Témoignage de Nicole, lesbienne africaine demandeur d'asile

Source:

D'auprès le documentaire de Merhaba et Alliage, Nicole lesbienne camerunaise nous explique son parcours pour enfuir son pays et demander l'asile à Bruxelles.

See English and French transcript of this video.



Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, 19 October 2011

LGBT Muslims in Europe organise conference

CALEM, the Confederation of Associations LGBTQI European and Muslim, is organising a conference in December in Brussels, "to enable inclusive Muslims, and particularly those who happen to be LGBTQIA individuals, to express their sexuality in peace, while defending their civic rights and human dignity through ideas and dialogue. "

The conference also aims to 'actively contribute to a reformed and genuinely inclusive representation of Islam' and a 'positive and constructive dialogue about Islam, within the Muslim world'

CALEM brings together four LGBT Muslim organisations, from Belgium, South Africa, France, Sudan and Egypt.

Speakers at the conference include Amina Wadud, a university professor "struggling for an Islamic feminism", Islamic Scholar Muhsin Hendricks, who is a human rights activist focusing on gender and sexual diversity in Islam, Ludovic Lotfi Mohamed Zahed, founder of the French LGBT Muslim collective HM2F, and Abdennur Prado, President of the Catalan ligue for Islamic reform  -

The conference will be attended by CALEM sister organizations from Europe, the Arabic world, Asia and Africa.

CALEM say that their network is "at the avant-garde of the reflection about Islam and sexual or gender diversity." In early 2011 they were involved in creating an International Network of Inclusive Muslims (INIMuslim).

INIMuslim (“I am Muslim” in Arabic) is a collaborative initiative of official organizations and associations worldwide, and selected experts, working internationally for the inclusivity of Muslims marginalized on the basis of their sexual or gender orientation, advocating both against “homophobia” and “islamophobia”, to defend their human rights.

The conference will include much discussion but will also include an "inclusive Muslim marriage religious celebration, thanks to our inclusive imams."

Friday, 23 September 2011

Poland: more on the pluses and minuses of asylum system

PolandImage by gibranparvez via Flickr
Via: Pambazuka

Katarzyna Przybyslawska of the Halina Niec Legal Aid Center, answers criticisms to asylum procedures in Poland made by the Belgian Refugee Council (see its report here). Her candid responses shows once again the urgency of independent legal aid providers and their need for more capacity to carry out their work efficiently and effectively.

The Halina Niec Legal Aid Center (HNLAC) is a non-profit non-governmental organisation established in 2002 in Kraków. HNLAC’s main objective is to protect human rights by providing free legal aid to persons at risk of social exclusion and discrimination, including the poor, victims of domestic violence, foreigners, asylum seekers and refugees. The HNLAC also monitors the adherence to standards of human rights, undertakes legal interventions and advocacy activities, and pursues research and educational projects. The centre also undertakes activities aimed at preventing and tackling human and child trafficking by organising social campaigns and offering legal aid to the victims. The HNLAC is UNHCR’s implementing partner in Poland.

The Belgian Refugee Council (BRC) report provides an assessment of the situation of asylum seekers in Poland, in particular those who were sent back to Poland as a country responsible for examining asylum application on the grounds of the Dublin II regulation. The report recognised both positive and negative aspects of Polish asylum system.

The first technical comment in response to the report is the erroneous use of the phrase: ‘closed reception centre/prison for asylum seekers’. There are no closed reception centres for asylum seekers in Poland and the establishment in Biala Podlaska is in fact a guarded center for foreigners … for the purpose of expulsion.

The Belgian Refugee Council praised the existence of non-EU based national protection status (tolerated stay permit) in the Polish legal system. The HNLAC wishes to stress the importance of this status with regard to safeguarding foreigners’ right to family life (art. 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms). It should be noted however that given the ongoing preparation of a new act on aliens and act on granting protection to aliens, this protection instrument will soon undergo a change and foreigners seeking legalisation of stay in Poland solely due to their family ties will be eligible for a regular residence permit. The tolerated stay permit will be still applied in cases of risks to other basic human rights.

Monday, 5 September 2011

In Belgium, does today's official LGBT asylum goodwill = tomorrow's new paradigm?

By Jan Beddeleem and Kenneth Mills

This is a draft translation of the article written in Dutch for the book 'Sex and stigma over grenzen heen', W. Peumans, 2011

The work ‘Sex and stigma beyond boundaries – an ethnographic study of homosexual and lesbian immigrants from the first and the first and a half generation in Flanders and Brussels’ is about the stigmatized sexual orientation in relation to migration. The reading that had to be done for the method used was fascinating and resulted in a contribution on the specific difficulties that arise when sexual orientation is the main reason for asylum application.

This article could not have been written without the many asylum applicants, lawyers and social workers whose tenacity and engagement ensured the respect of the fundamental rights of human beings  and the respect of the access to justice on the basis of the Belgian Alien Law. In many cases the respect of the fundamental rights of human beings during the asylum procedure was being tested and elaborated in caselaw where sexual orientation was insignificant. Hence, LGBT asylum applicants are indebted to heterosexual asylum applicants and their entourage.

The openness and willingness to share stories and experiences on asylum applications where sexual orientation was indeed significant in a publication on ‘Sex and Stigma’ is in turn a contribution to anchor the respect of the fundamental rights of human beings within the Belgian Alien Law. In this contribution, the term LGBT asylum applicants is used consistently. The term ‘homosexual’, which in the jurisprudence on LGBT asylum claims is still most used, dates from the period when another sexuality than heterosexuality was pathologised and described with medical terms. This term is not part of the self-identification terminology of the social group referred to (Budd 2009:2).

The challenges and views treated in this article are inspired by the experiences of LGBT asylum applicants and their allies in their search for protection of their rights. The term allies is broad and as can be derived from the title, the authors are not taking position as to whether the government is by definition the enemy nor as to the opinion that LGBT asylum applicants are disadvantaged compared to asylum applicants without sexuality-related reason.

In the past few years, the Belgian authorities have shown lots of goodwill regarding the respect of the principle of equality and of non-discrimination when treating asylum applications on the basis of sexual orientation, especially the Commissariaat Generaal voor Vluchtelingen en Staatlozen (CGVS), responsible for the determination procedure and thus for the assessment of credibility. We met on our way, many asylum applicants who threw away their chances by presenting themselves and the story of their flight in a questionable manner.

The main question in this contribution is whether today’s goodwill could be the basis of tomorrow’s new paradigm. This question focuses on the difficulties and challenges when assessing the credibility of a LGBT asylum application.

This article does not reveal elements from the private life of the asylum applicants, not even anonymously. The focus is on the determination process and the possibilities and perspectives to conceive the status determination in such a way that LGBT asylum applicants receive the optimal chances to underpin their asylum application in a context in which the CGVS is also empowered to take responsibility for the procedures and references used to judge one’s credibility. The trust the asylum applicants had in the authors to share their story and experience is thus gratefully used to feed a constructive dialogue on the assessment of credibility.

Are LGBT asylum applications more complicated than other applications?

It would be unfair towards the people behind the asylum applications that are very complicated and sometimes very painful and that are not gender-related to merely assume that a LGBT asylum application is more complicated than other applications. There are however some differences worth mentioning. There are also similarities, for instance the CGVS is authorised to refuse the status of refugee to asylum applicants because of lies in their statements or because of lack of co-operation.

Persecution

Thursday, 28 July 2011

Report: In six EU countries refugee protection "significantly divergent"

yellow umbrellaImage by solidether via Flickr
Source: UNHCR

"Safe at Last? Law and Practice in Selected EU Member States with Respect to Asylum-Seekers Fleeing Indiscriminate Violence" examines the application in particular of Article 15(c) of the EU's Qualification Directive (QD), under which Member States are required to grant subsidiary protection to persons fleeing ''serious and individual threat to a civilian’s life or person by reason of indiscriminate violence in situations of internal or international armed conflict."

The research has focused on the practice of six EU Member States who received together 75% of EU asylum claims in 2010: Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and the UK. The study looked in particular at the assessment of claims for protection by Afghans, Iraqis and Somalis.

The study found, among other things, that the approaches to application of Article 15(c) of the Qualification Directive are significantly divergent between the six Member States examined. In some cases, it would appear to be applied in such a narrow manner that protection is denied to many persons which Article 15(c) was originally intended to cover. In some States, it is applied to an extremely small percentage of people fleeing situations of violence and armed conflict overall.

In addition, it appeared that States are not granting refugee status under the 1951 Refugee Convention to some people fleeing indiscriminate violence who, in UNHCR's view, would be entitled to it. It is found moreover that the added value of Article 15(c ) QD compared to Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is not clear; that approaches to assessing the level of violence required to trigger
application of the provision vary widely; and that the concept of a "real risk" is interpreted in a way that imposes a heavy burden on applicants to show they are exposed to individual risks.

Based on these findings, UNHCR puts forward nine recommendations to Member States and the EU in order to ensure that protection is granted to persons fleeing indiscriminate violence.

Safe at Last? Law and Practice in Selected EU Member States with Respect to Asylum-Seekers Fleeing Indiscri...

Saturday, 2 July 2011

In Poland, refugees left without protection unless they're Christian?

PolandImage by gibranparvez via Flickr
Source: ECRE

The Belgian Refugee Council (CBAR – BCHV) have published a report highlighting that Poland does not always grant refugee status, even when it should, because of a very strict interpretation or sometimes misinterpretation of the refugee definition. The interpretation applied by the Polish authorities is often not in line with UNHCR guidelines, UNHCR handbook and the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR).

The majority of all asylum applications in Poland come from Russian nationals (80%), mainly Chechens, followed by Georgia (11%), Armenia (1%), Belarus (1%), Ukraine (1%) and other nationalities (6 %). In 2010, Belgium received on average 58 asylum seekers every month who had entered the EU through Poland. According to Eurostat figures, in 2010, Belgium requested Poland under the Dublin system to examine 1,254 asylum applications. France asked Poland to assume responsibility for 1,302 people. Germany, Austria, the Netherlands and Switzerland did the same for 1,124, 818, 748 and 307 people respectively.

On the positive side, in addition to refugee status and subsidiary protection, Poland can also grant 'tolerated stay permits' for an indefinite period of time, based on articles 2 (right to life), 3 (prohibition of torture), 4 (prohibition of slavery and forced labour), 5 (right to liberty and security), 6 (right to fair trial) or 8 (right to family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.

The report is based on a mission to Poland in September 2010 under the direction of MEP Bart Staes, aiming to assess the situation of asylum seekers in Poland particularly in the context of those who have been sent back to Poland from Belgium under the Dublin Regulation. In 2010, only 14.6% of the 6,500 applicants who sought asylum in Poland were granted international protection.

In January, a ruling by the ECtHR put into question the assumption upon which the Dublin system is based, that is, that all EU Member States respect fundamental rights and that is therefore safe to automatically transfer asylum seekers between EU countries.

Poland's foreign minister returned from a trip to Tunisia 17 May with 16 Christian refugees who had found their lives upturned by turmoil in North Africa.

Poland described the move as a gesture of symbolic support for Christians in Africa and as an act of solidarity with Tunisia, which has been overwhelmed by refugees fleeing the violence in neighboring Libya.

"Poland looks after the rights of Christians in the world. This is our gesture of solidarity with persecuted Christians," Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski told the refugees as they prepared to board the plane to Poland a day earlier.

One analyst described the move as a clear call to the rest of Europe to take in more refugees and have more open borders. Marcin Zaborowski, director of the Polish Institute of International Affairs, said that Poland believes "Europe should be more open" and that the government is urging greater openness as it prepares to take over the rotating presidency of the European Union on July 1.

The Foreign Ministry described the six adults and 10 children as political refugees from Eritrea and Nigeria who had been in refugee camps in Libya until they fled the civil war there to Tunisia.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, 12 June 2011

In Europe, asylum seekers 'right to try their luck in a specific country'

The European Union (EU) Union européenneImage via Wikipedia
Source: CIRÉ

Interview with Kris Pollet, Senior Legal and Policy Officer at ECRE

Despite the current crisis, the Belgian reception systemfor asylum seekers is probably one of the best in the European Union.

This leads some people to assume that Belgium is "too generous" in comparison to other countries, and that such generosity could be a pullfactor. According to Kris Pollet, the real situation is not that simple:
“As long as there are such large disparities among the various asylum and reception systems, asylum seekers are right to try their luck in a specific country”. 
Is this the European Union's fault? No! Member States who don't play by the rules and start grumbling at the very mention of solidarity regarding migration and asylum are to blame.

Q: When we take a close look at the number of asylum applications in Europe, can we say that this number has “spectacularly” increased in Belgium?
A: Eurostat recently published figures for 2010, which demonstrates that the reported “spectacular increase of asylum claims in Europe” is not the case. 260,000 persons claimed asylum in Europe, and approximately one-tenth of those claims were registered in Belgium. At the European level, this figure is stable compared to 2009, even slightly decreasing (-5%). However, we can see an increase of asylum applications in some countries, such as Belgium (+16%), Germany (+49%), Sweden (+32%) and Denmark (+30%).

Q: If we compare the number of asylum claims to States' population, where does Belgium stand?
A: Belgium is the fourth country in terms of asylum applications, after France, Germany and Sweden. Some people claim that it is due to Belgium's high standards regarding reception of asylum seekers. Given the sensitivity of this issue, it is important to be cautious when launching such theories. There are several elements to consider and, in reality, it is difficult to prove whether this is true or not. It is a multidimensional issue where too much is at stake to determine which factor makes the difference.

Q: What are the factors to consider?
A: Beyond the quality of the reception system and asylum procedures, factors such as the country's geographic location and reputation, the links that smugglers have with it, the migratory routes, or the (often inaccurate) information conveyed by the diaspora and/or traffickers must be taken into consideration. There is also the question of visa waivers, as we have witnessed recently in Belgium with the arrival of more Serbian and Macedonian citizens. On this point, it is interesting to see despite the fact that visas have also been lifted for Albanian citizens, there hasn't been an increase in the number of arrivals.

Q: Does the fact that asylum seekers are accommodated in hotels and have the possibility to receive per diem play a role?

Wednesday, 25 May 2011

Audio: Problems with LGBT asylum in Europe - and correcting a report

Source: Deutche Welle



By Laura Schweiger

Fearing for their lives in nations where homosexuality is illegal, some gays and lesbians seek asylum in Europe. But not all EU countries treat LGBT refugees equally and many claims are reportedly dismissed unfairly.

Same-sex sexual acts are illegal in over 70 countries, including seven which invoke the death penalty for breaking this law. It's therefore no surprise that some gays and lesbians seek asylum in more gay-friendly countries, including in European nations like Belgium, Germany and the UK.

Yahia Zaidi is one such refugee. He arrived in Belgium almost three years ago seeking asylum on account of his sexual orientation, as well as his political activism in Algeria for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) people.

The young gay man had spearheaded an HIV/AIDS prevention organization for the gay community in the cities of Algiers and Oran. Persecution from the general public as well as government officials was a part of life for Zaidi in his homeland.

"I got arrested in Algeria once when I was 17 years old. I was just hanging out on the street with a friend, but I looked a bit effeminate with my long hair," he remembered.

"The policeman was trying to force me to sign something that I didn't admit to, so I didn't sign it. Then another policeman signed it on my behalf. Since that time I have been publicly outed with the police and the government in Algiers, and they even keep a register containing all the names of gay people in Algeria."
Most LGBT asylum claims dismissed

At the UN, ILGA loses again; In US, evangelicals train UN delegates

By Paul Canning

The International Lesbian and Gay Association (ILGA) has lost its third bid for consultative status as a non-governmental organisation (NGO) at the United Nations.

According to the UN, the procedure followed means that after ten years of applications the ILGA application is now "closed".

The close vote at the Committee on Non-Governmental Organizations was lost due to a switch to no by Kygyzstan, the absence of Cuba and the abstentions of Nicaragua and Venezuela.

The session was marked by attempts at blocking actions and a failed attempt at humour by Belgium.

Report from UN watcher Inner City Press:
First, countries which opposed ILGA tried to stop them on a so called no-action vote, emphasizing that the group had declined to answer a new round of questionnaires, calling them discriminatory. In February, as exclusively covered by Inner City Press, ILGA was blocked by a no-action vote, 9-7.

This time the blocking vote failed, 7 to 7 with several abstentions:

US- No. Venezuela- abstain. Belgium- No. Bulgaria- No. Burundi- Yes. China- Yes. India – No. Israel- No. Kyrgyzstan- Abstain. Morocco- Yes. Mozambique- Abstain. Nicaragua- Abstain. Pakistan- Yes. Peru- No. Russia- Yes. Senegal- Yes. Sudan- Yes. Turkey- No

After that vote, Belgium asked the committee chair for “rules of procedure for dummies.” Venezuela took exception to being called a dummy. Things proceeded without humor.
The final vote was:
Sudan- No. Turkey- Yes. US- Yes. Venezuela- Abstain. Belgium- Yes. Bulgaria- Yes. Burundi- No. China- No. India- Yes. Israel –Yes. Kygryzstan – No. Morocco- No. Mozambique- Abstain. Nicaragua- Abstain. Pakistan- No. Peru- Yes. Russia – No. Senegal- No.
Belgium, who moved the consultatative status request, said:

Tuesday, 1 February 2011

In Belgium, a growth in sexuality-based asylum claims

The flag of BelgiumImage via Wikipedia
Source: de Standard

[Google translation]

By Yves Delepeleire

Czech Republic was criticized last year when the European baking asylum seekers who claimed to be gay to heterosexual porn were watching while they were connected to a machine that measured blood flow to the penis. The 'fallometrische tests "were then not used.

The idea is - thankfully - never occurred in Belgium. But here, the asylum authorities is difficult to prove whether an applicant is gay. Asylum seekers who fear to be persecuted or discriminated against for their sexual orientation can be refugees. In recent years there are more such striking asylum seekers with gender-related persecution motifs, from 116 in 2006 to 362 in 2009.

But how do you check that? Unlike political opinion sexual orientation is entirely within the private sphere. Only the right questions, it is possible to distinguish liars gay asylum seekers. Just as the apron.

Asks the General Commissariat for Refugees and Stateless Persons (CGRA) now advice to gay clubs.

"The Commissioner is doing a good job in an immensely difficult task. But there is still some lacking in the interviews," says Jan Beddeleem. He is director of the association WISH. As a confidant of asylum seekers who claim to be gay, he often experienced interviews.

"Thus, the interrogators lack anthropological knowledge about what it is as gay in a certain culture to grow, such as the Masai in Kenya. It is also often assumed that everyone already has deployed as gay as he is in Belgium. "

"For example, asylum seekers are more often expected to know what gay bars in their town or in which article of the Criminal Code states that homosexuality is punishable. As if you know any gay. Not those who can answer factual questions, the Commissioner shall not contribute to the credibility of his story. But we feel that such questions are not the crux of the matter," says Beddeleem.

"On the other hand some applicants are not asked how sexual contacts. However, many can explain. How do you start having sex with men in rural Kenya? How did you all this time to the community hidden? For non-gay people is very hard to be creative to respond. That you get like this. Questions about the sexual act itself again out of the question. They are discriminatory because they are not heterosexuals be asked."

Also, vocabulary, accents, gestures and expressions do much. "In the gay environment in Kinshasa kipopo speak often, a code language that descends from Togolese miners in order to group lines. To argue regularly in the gay environment in Kinshasa to stop, but do not know those words, falls through the basket."

"I sat in an interview with someone from Tanzania. He said: "I do not think I'm gay. Daarmee He meant only that he had not had anal sex, not that he was not on men. It would be good if the Commissioner who teaches sensibilities."
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, 22 January 2011

Dublin agreement sunk, no more returns to Greece says Euro Court

The hole in the ship Amalthea after the bomb p...Image via Wikipedia
Source: Free Movement

The European Court of Human Rights has just held that it is unlawful to send asylum seekers to Greece under what is widely known as the ‘Dublin II’ Regulation for their asylum claims to be processed there. The case is MSS v Greece and Belgium, no. 30696/09, 21 January 2010 (BAILII link to follow when available but available now on HUDOC or Word .doc file (large)).

In this landmark judgment the Court holds that the detention conditions to which the claimant was briefly exposed amounted to a breach of Article 3 and that the living circumstances of the claimant also amounted to a breach of Article 3. It then goes on to find that the Greek asylum process is so woeful that it amounts to a breach of Article 13 of the Convention. To top it all, the Court concludes that Belgium violated Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention by returning the claimant to Greece and thereby exposing him to these other breaches.
To cap it all, substantial damages are then awarded to the claimant against Belgium.

In respect of detention conditions, Strasbourg already found in an earlier case last summer that Greek detention facilities amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment. See AA v Greece, no. 12186/08, 22 July 2010. In this new case the Court goes on and finds as follows:

Saturday, 11 December 2010

As Europe freezes, so do many asylum seekers

Frozen streets of AmsterdamImage by Nir Nussbaum via Flickr  
Source: Ecre

The cold winter weather has brought to the forefront of discussions the issue of reception of asylum seekers in several European countries.

In Belgium, where the thermometer reached -10°C this month, there are nearly 7,000 homeless asylum seekers, emergency housing still lacks  (PDF) and the new places promised by the government are still to be opened. NGOs are mobilised, but the situation is such that UNHCR accused the country of “dragging its feet in a humanitarian crisis”.

In France, places in shelters are so limited that some Prefectures decided to refuse access to homeless asylum seekers, including people awaiting for a decision on their asylum claim and those who have already received a negative decision. This is despite Prime Minister François Fillon's commitment few weeks ago to provide shelter to everyone in need during the winter.

Dutch immigration minister Gerd Leers also said recently that asylum seekers would not be put on the streets if it was very cold. “That goes without saying”, the minister assured to MPs. However, in the Netherlands too, asylum seekers whose applications haven't been successful have been evicted from reception centres.

Many people seeking protection in our countries have recently escaped from traumatic experiences, sometimes involving the disappearance or death of relatives and friends, torture or armed conflicts. How will they find the rest, safety and respect they need if they have to sleep rough?
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, 30 November 2010

Belgium's asylum crisis: an overview

protesting against expulsions of asylum seekersImage via Wikipedia
Source: Gazet Van Antwerpen

By John Dewit

[Google translation]

Fedasil, the service receives asylum seekers, put an hour on strike 18 November to protest against the staffing problems at the service. Meanwhile, the number of asylum seekers became known later this year over 27,000 will come true. The Parliamentary Committee for Home Affairs in October devoted a major debate on the asylum crisis and the Senate did week 25 November. State Secretary for Migration Melchior Wathelet (CDH) is also preparing a reform of the asylum law, but as long as the government's pending cases, is difficult. A state of affairs.

Fedasil, the service responsible for the reception of asylum seekers, today put an hour on strike because the staff contracts expire on December 31, the staff do not know if their job is extended. The department also wants more staff to cope because the number of applicants ever increasing. The service wants all day Monday ek down tools. Meanwhile, the number of asylum seekers swings through the roof. The situation is so dramatic?

WHAT IS THE PROBLEM?

Thursday, 11 November 2010

Discrimination against LGBT migrants in Belgium

Report from three Belgian LGBT organisations Alliàge, Merhaba and Le Cripel on discrimination against LGBT migrants. Only in Flemish and in French.

Double Discrimination Migrant Et LGBT

Tuesday, 26 October 2010

Now Belgium stops sending asylum seekers back to Greece

Source: ECRE

Belgium’s Secretary of State for asylum, Melchior Wathelet, has announced that Belgium will not transfer asylum seekers to Greece and will give priority to the examination of these asylum claims. Amnesty International, CIRE, the Belgian Committee for Aid to Refugees, ECRE, JRS-Belgium and Flemish Refugee Action welcomed this decision but demanded a complete revision of the Dublin Regulation, which allows refugees to be sent back to countries that do not provide sufficient protection.

The UN Special Rapporteur on torture, Manfred Nowak, has also called this week on the EU to stop transfers of asylum seekers to Greece and to renegotiate the Dublin II Regulation.

Belgium’s decision follows the reception of a letter in which the European Court of Human Rights states that pending the adoption of its judgment in MSS v. Belgium and Greece - which assesses whether sending asylum seekers back to Greece violate the European Human Rights Convention-, all transfers will be temporarily suspended in any case where an asylum seeker challenges his or her return to Greece.

The UK and Norway have also stopped tranfers to Greece and are applying the sovereignty clause and therefore assuming the examination of these asylum applications. The Netherlands is suspending transfers for those who appeal the decision.

ECRE supports the establishment of a mechanism to suspend transfers of asylum seekers to states that cannot guarantee a full and fair examination of their claims or proper receptions standards. Suspension should also be accompanied by supporting measures that seek to rectify the asylum situation in a Member State.

Sources:
For further information:
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, 23 September 2010

European Commission: asylum procedures "susceptible to administrative error"

European flag outside the CommissionImage via Wikipedia  
Source: Europa

The European Commission report on the application of the Directive on minimum standards on procedures for granting and withdrawing refugee status shows that procedural guarantees still vary considerably across the EU. Moreover, the vagueness of the standards set by the Directive and flaws in the implementation at national level may lead to administrative errors. The Commission adopted on 21 October 2009 a proposal to recast the Directive in order to remedy to these deficiencies.

"There are still significant divergences among national asylum procedures and present rules fall short in preventing administrative errors: I call on the European Parliament and the Council to adopt the amendments that the Commission proposed in 2009 to remedy this situation", said European Commissioner for Home Affairs Cecilia Malmström. She added: "The Commission will continue to examine and pursue all cases where problems of implementation were identified, so as to ensure the correct application of the Directive, in particular with regard to the respect for the principle of non-refoulement and for the other rights laid down in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, as well as to reduce the scope for divergences."

The Asylum Procedures Directive was designed to establish minimum standards for fair and efficient procedures for granting and withdrawing refugee status.

Monday, 6 September 2010

Summer update on LGBT asylum issues in the European institutions

EU symbol 1 2Image via Wikipedia By Joël Le Déroff, ILGA-Europe

ILGA-Europe, the European region of the International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association, has been active this summer to raise the issue of LGBT-related asylum claims in the European institutions. In the context of the on-going reform of EU law, we promoted various initiatives and meetings.

In the autumn, two directives are going to be discussed in the European Parliament (first reading), which is an important step, since the Parliament has become a full co-legislator after the entry into force of the Lisbon treaty.

Just before the beginning of the parliamentary holidays, ILGA-Europe has organised an exchange in the European Parliament, with the support of the Intergroup on LGBT rights and MEPs Sylvie Guillaume, rapporteur on the Procedures for Granting and Withdrawing International Protection Directive (“Procedure Directive”) and Jean Lambert, rapporteur on the Qualification for International Protection Directive (“Qualification Directive”).

The exchange was an opportunity to present our positions to various MEPs working on the asylum directives, and to make sure that potential supporters coming from different political groups could better coordinate themselves when the Parliament resumes its works. ILGA-Europe invited the coordinator of the gender and sexual orientation team of Belgium’s Office of the Commissioner General for Refugees and Stateless Persons (CGRA), Ms valentine Audate, to give a presentation. This proved to be very useful to illustrate the problems faced by LGBT asylum seekers during the whole asylum procedure.

In early September, ILGA-Europe has also met with Commission’s officials, to assess their availability to listen to our positions, in view of the preparation of the following steps of the legislative process. These exchanges were also an opportunity to promote some amendments to the EU legislation. For more information on the EU legislative process, please contact Joël Le Déroff: joel@ilga-europe.org.  

On a different note, following the conference on “LGBTI asylum seekers and refugees: a case of double jeopardy?”, organised in London in July, ILGA-Europe has joined the organisers to participate to the redaction of a Declaration of Human Rights for LGBTI Asylum Seekers, which will include a call for change in asylum systems in Europe and in the world.

Finally, thanks to research carried out earlier this summer, ILGA-Europe will publish soon an improved resource section on our website. Information will be available on asylum legislation in European countries, and on how to better look for and find country-of-origin information.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, 10 March 2010

An Iranian asylum seeker in Brussels

Coat of arms of the Islamic Republic of Iran. ...Image via Wikipedia
Source: ILGA

By K

I come from Iran. I was born in 1979. I lived in Iran until 2006. I arrived in Belgium in 2007.

I am gay and during 2 years I had experienced very big problems in jail in Iran, my country.

In jail in Iran I was beaten several times by men from the secret police, struck with a knife in my knee and my lower belly at the right side, struck with wrists twice in my nose.

They beat me up for a full day sometimes, sometimes longer. During two years they had called my family or sometimes they called me out of home to arrest me. Then it was questioning, beating up, sleep shortage and food cuts during three days.

In the last month of 2003 (I can't say when exactly since the Persian calender differs) I was arrested in the street by a car. Three policemen in plain clothes called me in. We drove to the jail. After two or three hours of beating up they gave me Ampod injections and a little morphin. I fell asleep. Two hours later I woke up and stood up. I could notice I had blood and sperm in my backside and down my thighs. I was told to leave the jail after I was forced to wash me in the toilets.

During two years and a half, up to 2006, I had had sex in the jail in Iran thirty to maybe forty times. I have never told anyone about this problem because I was afraid for my little brother and my family.

Thank you very much.
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Sunday, 5 December 2004

The grim fate that awaits those deported to Congo

Source: IRR News

By Arun Kundnani

The plane lands at Ndjili airport, Kinshasa, in the dead of night - the better to avoid monitoring by journalists and human rights activists. Then the returning asylum seekers are led out onto the tarmac by their European escorts to be handed over to the Congolese authorities. Some will have suffered violence in the process of being deported or in the detention centre where they were held prior to the flight. Others will have been tied to the seats with scotch tape for the duration of the seven-hour journey. Most would have been prevented from using the toilet or eating. They are handed over to the offices of the Director-General of Migration (DGM), ostensibly the Congolese immigration service but, in reality, an arm of the government's security services. A file containing details of their claim for political asylum in Europe is also passed to the DGM. According to René Kabala Mushiya, an activist who works in Kinshasa with the National Human Rights Observatory, this is the moment when European governments abandon those who have claimed asylum in their countries to a state which violates human rights with impunity.

Talking to IRR News while on a visit to the UK to address the Bar Human Rights Committee, René Kabala Mushiya has outlined a trail of abuse that stretches from Europe's immigration detention centres to the brutality and violence of DRC's notorious Makala Central Prison - nicknamed the 'morgue' in recognition of the numbers of people who have lost their lives there.

'According to reports that we have had from returning asylum seekers as well as from agents of the DGM, deportees are held by the DGM in small cells at the airport,' he says. 'There are no windows and there is no light. But you can see cockroaches and rats. From these cells, they are called in one by one to the director of the DGM for an interrogation.'

During the interrogation, deportees are sifted into different groups. Only those able to pay a bribe of between US $250 and $300 have a chance of immediate escape from detention. Since the officials of the DGM have not been paid for so long, accepting bribes is their only income. Yet few deportees have easy access to these sums of money; it would take a university professor six months to earn the required amount on local wages.

Illegal detentions

Of those who cannot bribe their way out, many will be handed over to the National Security Agency (ANR) which operates its own extra-judicial prisons where people are detained illegally for long periods of time. As individuals who have claimed asylum in Europe, deportees are automatically regarded by the ANR as threats to national security in Congo. Simply because they have claimed asylum in the West, the Congolese authorities consider them political dissidents. 'There are cases I have dealt with,' says René Kabala, 'in which somebody asks for asylum in Europe for humanitarian rather than political reasons. However when they are returned to Ndjili airport, they are put in prison like all the others.' They may then stand trial under the national security legislation and, if convicted, find themselves imprisoned at Makala.

Makala is a place where prisoners depend on outside support for food and medical care. The US State Department reports that sixty-nine people died there in 2003, some as a result of severe beatings, the others as a result of starvation and disease. But often the families of returned asylum seekers have already fled the capital to avoid persecution, meaning that deportees sent to Makala are less likely to have networks of outside support.

According to René Kabala, there are lots of cases of political prisoners who have been held at Makala by the Congolese authorities, then bribed their way out before fleeing to Europe to claim asylum. But because of Europe's failure to properly assess asylum claims, these asylum seekers have then been sent back into the hands of the authorities from whom they fled and, in turn, find themselves back at Makala prison, the very place from which they were hoping to escape. Asylum hearings in Europe tend to be sceptical about stories of bribery, further reducing the chances of sanctuary for refugees from places like Makala prison.

Insecurity

René Kabala cannot produce figures on what proportion of asylum seekers deported from Europe end up in Makala or other forms of illegal detention in Kinshasa. 'There are many cases which escape us,' he says. 'We can follow up those that we know about. Others disappear if we haven't got contact details for their families.' But even those deportees who are released face insecurity. The DGM takes down details of all deportees' family members and, often, agents arrive on their doorsteps a few weeks later to make arrests. Some deportees have chosen to disappear on their return to Kinshasa to avoid re-arrest.

The allegation that files containing information about asylum claims are ending up, via the DGM, in the hands of the Congolese security services is particularly disturbing. Frances Webber, a leading immigration barrister in the UK, told IRR News: 'If these claims are true, it is a matter of extreme concern that asylum files which are meant to be confidential are finding their way to the very agencies which asylum seekers have fled.'

The majority of deportations from Europe to DRC originate in Belgium and Netherlands. Current Home Office policy is that failed Congolese asylum seekers should be deported from the UK. The expectation is that Britain will follow in the footsteps of Netherlands and embark on a much tougher regime for Congolese asylum seekers under which detentions and deportations will be stepped up. The National Coalition of Anti-Deportation Campaigns (NCADC) knows of four Congolese asylum seekers who have been returned from the UK in the last six months. The most recent was Bonnet Malungidi Mbombila, a paranoid schizophrenic who needs weekly injections. At first a fax and email campaign by supporters persuaded Air France to abandon the deportation. But NCADC believes he has now been returned to Kinshasa. It says it is in touch with a number of asylum seekers who have been removed from the UK and who allege that they have since been held in detention in DRC.

'H' is a Congolese asylum seeker whose claim for refugee status in Britain has been rejected at appeal and who now faces deportation to Kinshasa. He cannot be named for his own safety. Before fleeing to London, he worked in DRC as a trade unionist. As a 'failed asylum seeker', his benefits and accommodation have been withdrawn and he currently has a peripatetic existence, sleeping on friends' floors for a few days at a time. He has lost contact with his wife and two young children who have also had to flee Kinshasa and have headed towards the border with Angola. Were he to be deported, 'H' would be unable to take any money with him, having had no entitlement to work. He would not therefore be able to bribe himself out of detention in Kinshasa. 'I would certainly be scared that I could end up in prison,' he told IRR News. 'I just hope it's not going to happen that way.'

Beaten

Earlier this year, Bail for Immigration Detainees (BID), a charity that supports asylum seekers held in UK detention centres, discovered that, of three deportees who were removed to DRC between October 2003 and April 2004, two were able to pass information back to the UK revealing that they had ended up in Makala Central Prison. BID has also documented abuses that occurred after thirteen Congolese asylum seekers were deported from the UK on a charter flight on 12 March 2002. According to the testimony of one of the deportees, who later returned to the UK, they were detained and beaten on a daily basis by three to six soldiers who accused them of being 'traitors'.

René Kabala's allegations were also corroborated by the Dutch NGO Docu-Congo. Speaking at a meeting at the Houses of Parliament earlier this month, Mieke Rang, co-ordinator of Docu-Congo, criticised reports that had been published by other NGOs on deportations to DRC. A report by the NGO Voices of the Voiceless, which had been commissioned by a European government, claimed that an international monitoring team had been operating at Ndjili airport to ensure the safety of deportees. In fact, says Mieke Rang, no such monitoring exists. 'To return someone to Kinshasa means to put them in the hands of the security services.'

The Home Office's Country Information and Policy Unit claims that there is no evidence that failed asylum seekers are persecuted after they are returned to DRC and that Congolese asylum seekers whose claims are rejected should, in principle, be deported.

Related Posts with Thumbnails